...metastatic breast cancer is the leading killer of women aged 35 through 55? The recommended age for breast cancer screening is 40. This means that women are developing, being diagnosed with, and are dying from breast cancer long before the medical field says they need to be worrying about it.
They do recommend to start screening earlier if you're from a family with a high risk for breast cancer. But that's only a small percentage of them. What about the rest of us, who have no known history of breast cancer in the family? And yet we develop the disease before the age of 40?
I'd say that breast cancer screenings need to start earlier, except mammograms are not as accurate on younger women due to the density of the breast tissue. Not all forms of breast cancer result in a lump, and in younger women, oftentimes by the time the lump is able to be detected, it's already advanced.
We have a test for gene markers that can tell us if we're more or less likely to develop breast cancer. Angelina Jolie put this on the forefront of the news. The BRCA 1 and 2 gene mutation, if present, results in a far higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer.
There's a few problems with that, though. For one, the tests can be expensive, and if your insurance won't cover them, the price tag is high enough to keep most women from being able to afford them. There are different types of BRCA testing, ranging in cost from $475 to about $4,000. When you're already paying for cancer treatment and numerous doctor visits, it's hard to find that level of spare change.
Only 5% of breast cancers are due to the BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 gene mutation. That means 95% of the breast cancers out there were not caused by any known genetic factor. I will stress the word 'known'. There's a lot of research that still needs to be done to identify genetic factors for breast cancer, and to make these tests more accessible to the average woman.
My own test results came back negative. I have only one known relation with a history of breast cancer, my great-grandmother on my mother's father's side. I had no reason to start screening earlier, or to suspect that a lump, itchy and painful like a cyst I had before, was anything less than another cyst.
We don't know enough about breast cancer. We pour all these resources into early detection programs and mammogram screenings, and not enough into research for a cause, research for viable, working treatments that can lead to a Stage IV patient being declared No Evidence of Disease. Why are so many women get breast cancer at earlier ages without any warning? Why do we not know this yet? More funding needs to go to research, so more gene markers can be discovered.
With all the awareness, Breast Cancer is still the leading killer of women between the ages of thirty-five and fifty-five. That is unacceptable.
No comments:
Post a Comment